Ti84

The Terms state users retain rights to content they submit, which is favorable. However, submitting content grants the vendor a broad worldwide license to use, reproduce, modify, and distribute it, which materially undercuts the ownership retention.

Neither document addresses ownership of outputs or results generated through the service. The Terms only assert vendor ownership of the website's own original content and functionality, leaving output ownership undefined.

The documents never mention AI models or training. The Privacy Policy does reserve a general right to use information to improve services, and the broad content license could theoretically cover such use, but there is no explicit statement about model training either way.

The documents are entirely silent on data retention periods, deletion rights, and deletion procedures. There is no retention schedule, no deletion SLA, and no described mechanism for users to request removal of their data.

The Privacy Policy discloses that third-party companies may be used to facilitate, provide, or analyze the services, but provides no detail on who these parties are, what data they receive, or any limits on their use. There is no mention of selling data, but the disclosure is vague and offers no user control.

Neither document provides any opt-out mechanism for data collection, analytics use, or third-party sharing. There is no reference to consent management, cookie controls, or any user-facing choice.

The documents name no regulatory frameworks and no certifications whatsoever. Assessed against the universal baseline (GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, etc.) and, given the edtech secondary sector, potentially COPPA/FERPA, nothing is mentioned — a significant gap for a tool marketed to students and children.

The product is a calculator emulator with no AI model described, and the documents make no mention of explainability, auditability, or enterprise audit rights. Silence is expected here given the product type but still means no transparency commitments exist.

The Privacy Policy offers only a single vague sentence about 'appropriate security measures' with no specifics on encryption, access controls, penetration testing, or incident response. No security page or trust center is referenced, and there are no breach disclosures.

The product markets itself as free with no account required, and no paid or enterprise tier is described in the documents. There is therefore no disclosed differential data handling, and no enterprise agreement was available to compare.

The documents do not explicitly address human review of user inputs. However, the broad content license and the general right to analyze usage to improve services leave open the possibility of staff access without any stated limitation.

The documents contain no references to government data requests, law enforcement cooperation, subpoenas, or litigation. This silence means users have no visibility into how the vendor would respond to such demands.

The Privacy Policy discloses collection of name, email, contact details, usage data, and device information including IP address, browser type, and operating system — a moderate PII footprint. No sensitive personal information categories are described as collected, though given the tool is marketed to students and children the absence of COPPA-aware disclosures is a concern.

Both documents are dated 2025/03/10, roughly 18 months before the analysis date, placing them in the 12–24 month window. The product surface describes a browser-based calculator emulator with no AI/ML functionality, and the policies contain no AI language — so there is no AI coverage gap, but the policies are generic boilerplate that only partially address the data flows (analytics, device data) the product implies.

Two documents were supplied — the Terms of Service and the Privacy Policy — and no contradictions were found between them. They cover largely non-overlapping topics, and where they touch on shared themes (data use, service improvement) they are consistent.